<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Twitter For Churches &#187; research</title>
	<atom:link href="http://twitterforchurches.com/blog/tag/research/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://twitterforchurches.com/blog</link>
	<description>Helping Churches Leverage Twitter</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:02:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter Users are Most Influential Online Group</title>
		<link>http://twitterforchurches.com/blog/2010/08/19/twitter-users-are-most-influential-online-group/</link>
		<comments>http://twitterforchurches.com/blog/2010/08/19/twitter-users-are-most-influential-online-group/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Coppedge</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[church twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[important followers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Influential]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[raving fans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[viral messaging]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twitterforchurches.com/blog/?p=311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s important to remember that the same people who Twitter about their consumer experiences will often be the very same people who tweet about their church experiences &#8211; both good and bad. A new study released by ExactTarget finds consumers who are active on Twitter are three times more likely to impact a brand&#8217;s online [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s important to remember that the same people who Twitter about their consumer experiences will often be the very same people who tweet about their church experiences &#8211; both good and bad.</p>
<p>A new study released by <a href="http://email.exacttarget.com/" target="_blank">ExactTarget</a> finds  consumers who are active on <a href="http://twitter.com">Twitter</a> are three times more likely to  impact a brand&#8217;s online reputation through syndicated Tweets, blog  posts, articles and product reviews than the average consumer. Here&#8217;s how that breaks down:</p>
<blockquote>
<table border="1" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" valign="top"><strong>Reason   to Twitter Company or Brand</strong> (% of US Twitter   Users)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"><strong><em>Reason to Twitter</em></strong></td>
<td valign="top"><strong><em>% of Users</em></strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Get updates on future products</td>
<td valign="top">38%</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Stay informed about company   activities</td>
<td valign="top">32</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Receive discounts and promotions</td>
<td valign="top">31</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Get updates on upcoming sales</td>
<td valign="top">30</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Ger free samples, coupons, etc</td>
<td valign="top">28</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">For fun or entertainment</td>
<td valign="top">26</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Get access to exclusive content</td>
<td valign="top">25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Learn more about company</td>
<td valign="top">25</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Show support to company to others</td>
<td valign="top">23</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Share ideas, provide feedback</td>
<td valign="top">20</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">For education about company topics</td>
<td valign="top">14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Recommended</td>
<td valign="top">14</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top">Get direct message from company</td>
<td valign="top">10</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="2" valign="top"><em>Source:   ExactTarget, August 2010</em></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</blockquote>
<p>While the information is focused on these tweeting consumer habits, the correlation between tweeting about a company/brand and a local church is very similar. In both instances, the experience determines why they&#8217;d tweet about either entity.</p>
<p>In the survey above, it&#8217;s worth noting that of the 13 &#8216;reason to Twitter&#8217; the top 8 &#8211; over half the list &#8211; are because of a benefit to the consumer. In church speak, this means that the person is interested in what you&#8217;re doing and is motivated to tweet about you. The implication for churches is to have a constantly updated, useful Twitter feed(s) so they can follow and discover benefits for themselves.</p>
<p>According to the report, daily Twitter users  are about three times as likely as internet users on average to upload  photos, four times as likely to blog, three times as likely to post  ratings and reviews, and nearly six times as likely to upload articles. Church translation: your Twitter followers are <em>sprayers</em> &#8211; people who <strong>will</strong> talk about their experiences with your church, share their thoughts, and generally make their feelings known online. In other words, your Twitter users are highly influential and worth your attention.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s also important to note that, given some love and attention, these people can be fantastic online advocates for your church and ministries. Raving fans who spread your message for you are exactly the kind of viral messaging you want online.</p>
<p><em>Content/Research sources: <a href="http://email.exacttarget.com/" target="_blank">ExactTarget</a> and the <a href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Archives.showArchive&amp;art_type=8" target="_blank">Center for Media Research</a></em></p>


<!-- Begin TwitThis script (http://twitthis.com/) -->
<div style="text-align:left;">
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://s3.chuug.com/chuug.twitthis.scripts/twitthis.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<a href="javascript:;" onclick="TwitThis.pop();"><img src="http://s3.chuug.com/chuug.twitthis.resources/twitthis_grey_72x22.gif" alt="TwitThis" style="border:none;" /></a>');
//-->
</script>
</div>
<!-- /End -->

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://twitterforchurches.com/blog/2010/08/19/twitter-users-are-most-influential-online-group/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Texting Stats Continue to Show Increase in Usage</title>
		<link>http://twitterforchurches.com/blog/2009/06/09/texting-stats-continue-to-show-increase-in-usage/</link>
		<comments>http://twitterforchurches.com/blog/2009/06/09/texting-stats-continue-to-show-increase-in-usage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 16:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Coppedge</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vlingo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twitterforchurches.com/blog/?p=282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A fascinating study with some very illuminating data was recently publicized by the Vlingo Consumer Mobile Messaging Habits Report. The entire article by Jack Loechner, from MediaPost.com, is posted here. I found some of these stats to be very educational. They show us, as local churches, the impact and signficance of leveraging texting, such as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A fascinating study with some very illuminating data was recently publicized by the <strong><a href="http://www.vlingo.com/">Vlingo</a></strong> <a href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=107052">Consumer Mobile Messaging Habits Report</a>. The entire article by Jack Loechner, from <strong><a href="http://mediapost.com">MediaPost.com</a></strong>, is posted <a href="http://www.mediapost.com/publications/?fa=Articles.showArticle&amp;art_aid=107052">here</a>.</p>
<p>I found some of these stats to be very educational. They show us, as local churches, the impact and signficance of leveraging texting, such as <strong><a href="http://www.twitter.com">Twitter</a></strong>, as an important strategy for these key demographics (and beyond).</p>
<ul>
<li>Nearly 60% of mobile phone owners use their phones to text</li>
<li>94% of teens make up the largest user group - 13 to 19 age group remains the most active, sending more than 500 texts per month on average</li>
<li>20-somethings at 87%</li>
<li>Those in their 40s, usage jumped from 56% in 2008 to 64% this year</li>
<li>Those in their 50s it jumped from 38% to 46%.</li>
</ul>
<p>Despite the popularity of mobile data services, of those surveyed:</p>
<ul>
<li>41% do not text</li>
<li>70% do not browse the Web on their mobile phones</li>
<li>73% do not use email on their mobile phones</li>
<li>74% report that they would use voice enablement as a way to make text messaging easier</li>
</ul>
<p>These trends show a lot of what is working and the growth and adoption rate of older demographics. These trends will continue and make it impossible for churches to ignore the importance of instant communication and conversation via text messaging.</p>
<p>Twitter&#8217;s free service, ease of use and meteoric rise in popularity make it one of the most effective tools for churches to use in leveraging text messaging. If you&#8217;ve not read it yet, go <a href="http://www.payloadz.com/go?id=585509">download a copy</a> of the E-Book, <em><strong>&#8220;The Reason Your Church Must Twitter&#8221;</strong></em> for only $5.</p>
<p><em><strong>What say you about this data?</strong></em></p>


<!-- Begin TwitThis script (http://twitthis.com/) -->
<div style="text-align:left;">
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://s3.chuug.com/chuug.twitthis.scripts/twitthis.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<a href="javascript:;" onclick="TwitThis.pop();"><img src="http://s3.chuug.com/chuug.twitthis.resources/twitthis_grey_72x22.gif" alt="TwitThis" style="border:none;" /></a>');
//-->
</script>
</div>
<!-- /End -->

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://twitterforchurches.com/blog/2009/06/09/texting-stats-continue-to-show-increase-in-usage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Social Networking&#8217;s Growth &amp; Reach</title>
		<link>http://twitterforchurches.com/blog/2009/02/26/social-networkings-growth-reach/</link>
		<comments>http://twitterforchurches.com/blog/2009/02/26/social-networkings-growth-reach/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Anthony Coppedge</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[church]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[who's using social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://twitterforchurches.com/blog/?p=105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve had several church pastors, communications directors and media staff ask me for some kind of statistical data to help them (and their church leadership) understand the impact, growth &#38; importance of social networking in our culture (specifically, the United States). I continue to find bits and pieces of data in stories and news items, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had several church pastors, communications directors and media staff ask me for some kind of statistical data to help them (and their church leadership) understand the impact, growth &amp; importance of social networking in our culture (specifically, the United States). I continue to find bits and pieces of data in stories and news items, but today I found some very interesting information which provides a bunch of highly useful data for explaining the fast adoption rate of social networking.</p>
<p>The following data comes from an article by the <strong>Center for Media Research</strong> (at <a href="http://mediapost.com">Mediapost.com</a>). You can subscribe to their daily newsletters for free if you are also interested in this kind of data.</p>
<p>A <a href="http://www.marketingcharts.com/interactive/socnets-grow-93-since-2006-poised-to-play-role-in-recession-7521/?utm_campaign=newsletter&amp;utm_source=mc&amp;utm_medium=textlink">Netpop study</a> found that<strong> social networking has grown 93% since 2006</strong> and 76% of US broadband users (105 million) are active contributors to the web via social media. In addition, approximately 29%, or 40 million broadband users, are regular contributors to the web specifically through social networking sites and are spending increasing amounts of their online time communicating with each other, both one-to-one and one-to-many.</p>
<p>In looking at the social network landscape, Netpop offers these Key findings about US social networkers:</p>
<ul>
<li> Social	    networkers in the US are most likely to be single, employed women, age	18-39 and living somewhere between Indiana and the Atlantic Ocean, or	   along the west coast.</li>
<li> A      typical social networker connects weekly with an average of 18 people	  one-to-one, and 110 people one-to-many.</li>
<li> Social	    networkers spend an average of 36% of their online time talking and      sharing.</li>
<li> Social	    networkers use multiple modes to communicate and stay in touch. These      include IM (Instant Messages), texts, blogs and microblogs (such as Twitter).</li>
</ul>
<p><span id="more-105"></span>The Insight study reports that, of those individuals who participate in a social networking site, 71% have profiles on two or more different properties, with 26% having established <em>four or more</em> profiles.</p>
<p>Among social networkers who report having two or three profiles:</p>
<ul>
<li> 25.6% are      18 to 24 years old</li>
<li> 23.3%	   are 25 to 34 years old</li>
<li> 14.7% are      35 to 44 years old</li>
<li> 15.6% are      45 to 54 years old</li>
<li> 18.4% are      55 to 64 years old</li>
</ul>
<blockquote>
<ol></ol>
</blockquote>
<p>Among people with four or more profiles:</p>
<ul>
<li> 31	percent are between the ages of 25 and 34</li>
<li> 14.1	  percent are 55 to 64 years old</li>
</ul>
<p><em>Source: Netpop Connect Social Networkers US, December   2008</em></p>
<p>There&#8217;s some really interesting data in there that shows the trending towards online communications habits. The fact that we&#8217;re seeing a wide cross-section of age demogrpahics using multiple online profiles (such as a combination of Facebook, Twitter, MySpace, Ning, etc.) is shattering the myth that only &#8220;young people&#8221; are using these online tools. Certainly, there&#8217;s a larger percentage of younger generations using it, but that&#8217;s to be expected. What&#8217;s most intriguing to me were the numbers of those even up to 64 years old who are leveraging these 21st century digital tools.</p>


<!-- Begin TwitThis script (http://twitthis.com/) -->
<div style="text-align:left;">
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://s3.chuug.com/chuug.twitthis.scripts/twitthis.js"></script>
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<a href="javascript:;" onclick="TwitThis.pop();"><img src="http://s3.chuug.com/chuug.twitthis.resources/twitthis_grey_72x22.gif" alt="TwitThis" style="border:none;" /></a>');
//-->
</script>
</div>
<!-- /End -->

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://twitterforchurches.com/blog/2009/02/26/social-networkings-growth-reach/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

